How to write a military essay?
Now, let’s turn to the military essay definition, which is a brief overview of the definition of the military concept and the most common methods of its enactment.
During the 20th century, among the industrialized countries, the United States, Italy, Hong Kong and Singapore were the most ambitious and uncompromising in struggle against corruption.
Consistent and persistent implementation of the function of the state was reflected in the work of the American military machine in the course of which large budgets were set. In the US economy, there were wars and revolutions. But the main purpose of the economy was the conquest of raw materials. In the process of adaptation to the changing conditions of life, creative abilities were developed. The army was formed and developed. The people were divided into the two classes: the rich and the poor.
Only the middle class can be called a “classical” institution. The other hand is the army, both in the urban and in the rural areas. In any case, participation of the middle class in state affairs is somewhat different from the opinions of the urban elite.
Any article about army essay may give the following idea: the army is an organized union of armed men, created and maintained by the society, each of them has its own qualities and characteristics. The actual participation of the middle class in state activity is manifested, first of all, in the army as a whole, and then – in the ranks of the army.
A number of rights, responsibilities, and principles of conduct are universal: adherence to the social and legal norms, the absence of censorship, propaganda, discipline, obedience to authority, patriotism.
Despite the most positive impressions, it should be noted in a military essay that, in some ways, the model of the army does not correspond to the reality, which is more complex, includes elements of a socio-political process. The internal contradiction of the two main models, the democratic and authoritarian orders, the contradiction between the ideal and the reality, the interaction of the antitheses in the course of which the social, professional, political, legal, and cultural work of the army is conducted.
For many people in the United States, the idea of a nation-state, a large family – it sounds strange and even scary. But a number of arguments proving that the family is not a bad model for the state, not a social institution. The, in fact, is not a social institution but a complex mechanism, a multitude of parts, which gives rise to contradictions, struggles and killings. The social work with the family is aimed at correcting the contradictions, integrating the spheres of experience and ideas to gain a common, collective experience. It includes the activities of social, professional, public organizations, research institutions, psychology, sociology, law, public organizations, and so on.
Because of the importance of the role of the family in social work, the contradiction between the ideal and the reality often becomes invisible. The idea of “American exclusiveness” becomes a myth. The population is instead represented by a multinational army – a “national idea”. The army is designed to conquer new lands and resources. The frontier is raised, new plans are made, the nature of military operations is refined.
Many experts believe that the design of the army is driven by the ideology of some nations of the world. Another interpretation is supported by the opinion of John P. Kennedy in the book “An American Dream”. The famous phrase is “there is no place for the traditional customs of the world in the Old World”.
The family is a unique society. It is both a and a unique phenomenon. The latter refers to the history of the family and the institution of the marriage. The family is a social institution in the most diverse areas of social life. All this is absolutely without any exception. Even the most brutal and rigid father-wife relationships are unnecessary in the family. The personal desires and needs of the spouses are fully developed.
The modern family faces many problems at the stage of formation. Communication with other members of the family is often hindered by a lack of communication with the parents, cause by alcoholism, divorce, death of relatives, cause by cruel treatment, etc.
Attacks on the family are very common. The psychological consequences of the impact of organizational factors, including alcohol abuse, can lead to the lifelong influence on the behavior of children by the age of puberty. Thus, the problem of child marriage on marital relations has become one of the big problems of the young families.
There is a stereotype that the marriage is a “young union” in which the child is brought up by both mother and father. However, the opposite situation often turns out to be true: child marriages are often the cause of the child marriages.
There is a special influence of family on the formation of the personality. The absence of close communication with a mother leads to the lack of empathy and psychological dependence on the child, his perception of own personality is higher, greater than the perception of own personality by the child.