How to write a persuasive essay?
The essay is a fairly free literary genre with a minimum of strict rules. The author should express his opinion with respect to the sentiments of the readers. It is expressed in a free form. This work can be uploaded to the Web and also available to anyone, including your teachers.
Essay is a kind of academic paper that has a small volume and focuses on some particular issue. Its feature is a free form of writing which is performed in an individual author’s manner. This work can be described as a philosophical, artistic, critical or journalistic genre.
Essay expresses your personal thoughts and views on certain things or events. That is, this essay is like your personal statement where you should write about some things that happen to you, the world around and the idea that arises in your head.
What is a persuasive essay?
A purpose of a persuasive essay is to convince readers that your point of view is valid, worth stating. It is based on a logical connection between arguments and examples. Thought must be provided in a convincing and understandable form.
A typical example is the argument about why the minimum wage should be raised. This argument is based on certain facts that are known to everyone. Arguments are places in the system of discourse where no one has yet experienced the feeling of a self-righteousness, and hence, the ability to speak logically. The ability to speak logically is used in the fields of science, finance, and management. In general, it is an ability to think logically, create logical chains, which makes the argumentation of any kind non-logical kind fallacious.
Every example of argument has two main arguments: premise (the argument is true, and the thesis is false) and conclusion (some general conclusions for a persuasive essay). This kind of approach includes a few rules that make the argumentation of any kind of statement based on any evidence whatsoever. The arguments to support a thesis are considered to be true when and where the thesis is stated, regardless of whether it is justified or not. The most important thing to note here is that not all self-righteousness is recognized in the term. Some judicial opinions even consider this factor in the definition of political freedom. Other legal means of defining political freedom are analyzed, and the ends of their use in the literature of the US Constitution.
Legal protections and rights related to the promotion of human rights were established in the United States at the very beginning of the last century. The first government document that had an impact on the thought of the First Amendment is the French Declaration of the Rights of the Man and of the Citizen, published in 1789. It stated that the fundamental rights inherent to each individual, regardless of his belonging to a particular social group.
Many people confuse the concept of freedom with political freedom, and this mistake is among the most common. According to the Constitution, political freedom is the right to take part in the management of affairs in the state of society, the right to paid vacation, to fair trial, to participate in the management of the state, and, especially, the right to elected to the House of Representatives. These rights, which were formulated earlier by English philosophers Thomas Paine and Aldous Huxley, constitute a set of civil liberties (the right to life, liberty, the right to freedom, etc.) belonging to each individual, regardless of his belonging to a particular social group. These are the natural rights of each. They are the values of the individual, the basis on which the political freedom rests.
The main legal act regarding the protection of human rights is the English jurisprudence of the Middle Ages in the field of human rights and natural law. This established the tradition of individual rights over the rights of others, as social and legal norms, without regard to the content of the Bill of Rights and other legal acts of the British Parliament. Early British lawmakers included this idea in the framework of natural law.
Social and legal norms of the British Parliament, in particular, originated in the 4th chapter of the North American Trade Act of that year. The first action in this regard was the refusal of the high customs duty on the import of indigestible goods.
The next stage in the development of the Bill of Rights was the adoption of the Legislation of that year. The main text of the paper is devoted to the opinion of English MPs concerning the distribution of property, control over the property of others, and the right to property, including the right to rent land, clothing, and food.
In the British colonies, a completely different attitude towards the distribution of property was established. Only the wealthy had the right to dispose of it. The poor had no right to lodging, to food, other daily need items, etc.
The important fact is that the trade in the North American colonies was predominantly to the lower class of the free white population, and the situation of the poor was aggravated in the process of redistribution.