How to write a political corruption essay?

How to write a political corruption essay?

It is not at all difficult to compose a good essay on political corruption. The topic is quite popular, and some people do not even know where to start. To help you with this task, we are going to provide basic terminology and definitions.

In the word, this word is used in two senses:

  • Undenacting certain members of the population, causing or assisting such problems in the implementation of their activities in the public interest. As a rule, such problems are caused by inaction of controlling bodies. However, as soon as the leadership reacts to the objective reality of corruption, this process is not completed. The reasons for this response are the introduction of a new management principle in the consciousness of the society, the lack of experience or the inability of leaders to work effectively.
  • Personal or family reasons for committing corrupt actions. They may be external, situational and internal.
  • Topics related to the analysis of the problem of corruption, for example, essay on the impact of corruption on family time. In this case, you may focus on the special conditions of family relationships and the problems associated with the transition of the society to the new level of family values.
  • The internal background of corruption. The general perception of corruption is the result of a complex set of external factors, which you should describe in your essay.
  • Indirect influences. These are the situations in which external factors actually took place: for example, the decline in the birth rate, the single-handedly decisions of the ruling elite, the triumph of modern ideals over the past centuries, etc.
  • External events. These are the most important for the political corruption essay. They can be presented as a sequence of successive transformations of the situation on the basis of external events, or they can be coordinated and dated. The transformations described below may be qualitatively different in different eras of political consciousness and are associated with the actions of separate individuals.
  • Conflict. In politics, the term “conflict” is used in two senses: as the immediate creation of additional, previously not described conflicts and phenomena, and as the most complex set of contradictions in the activities of the opposing party. Usually, it is accompanied by the interests of other, usually diametrically opposite points of view.
  • Non-conflict. It is also understood as a combination of conflicted tendencies, interests and motives for adopting a particular position. For example, the opposition of the party for the leadership of the country may be the cause of the occurrence of new political events, the revolution in the party and the creation of a new government.
  • Social. Since the emergence of society, the basic need of everyone is the opportunity to get a living, to love, and to work. However, individuals often do not consider their social status and position in the society, the content of their activity in the family as of its high value. Marriage, kinship, property, and inheritance of wives are higher, deeper, more developed, and (in the system of patriarchy) more fruitful. The increase in the number of young widows, in turn, the tendency of them to the spread of “family tokens” – personal tokens, reward tokens, etc. The habit of socialization is reinforced by the artificial increase in the value of certain social roles (the status of the leader is especially high).
  • High autonomy of the individual. The ability to control own behavior is higher than the ability to control others. Hence, the personality develops the ability to make decisions, set priorities, set boundaries, which for himself determines the course of behavior.
  • Self-control. The person is able to influence the behavior of other people, resulting in a high success rate.
  • The ability to set specific tasks and the associated with the experience of the leader.
  • The unity of the person.
  • READ:  What is a definition of poverty, which is a nature of a thing (behaviour, feelings, etc.) understood as a material or spiritual state of a person. According to Marx, it is a social category, the ratio of the amount of productive forces maintained by the population, which, however, were not always found in the capitalist class. The mass content of the population is more important than the number of productive forces. The ratio of the mass production of agrarian production to the population is one of the main indicators of the progress of the economy in the form of economic progress: the agency which provides the means of subsistence for a part of the population and provides the means of subsistence for the others.