How to write a synthesis essay?
It is necessary to adhere to some common features when writing a synthesis essay:
American literature on cultural violence
Sexual violence in the United States is estimated from 3.5 million to 10 million victims. More than 80% of them are women. American women have been forced to become the sexual slaves since the middle of the 20th century.
According to the National Sexual Assault Hotline, more than 800,000 women were forced to have sex with a partner at least once in a sexual relationship. But it is even more difficult to believe in the number of women who experienced domestic violence. The fact is that and especially women, targets of verbal insults and insults, feel the maximum shock and are exposed to increased danger.
Women subjected to sexual abuse have excessive patience and readiness for the repeated forgiveness of the offender. This patience is associated with a feeling of fear of economic complications, an unwillingness to leave the marriage, the belief that the partner will always remain with the offender, even when it is hostile. The consequence of the daily pressure on women is the daily suffering of various types of abuse, including sexual.
The economy of exploitation is based on the victim’s need to attract attention and attention of the offender. In the system of exploitation, the offender himself may be a “face”, a “business card” in the image of which is taken by the target. The image of the offender is his “will”, his “strength”, his “veterility” defines the concept of his “status”. That is why he can be both a “face” and a “person”.
The cult of spontaneity, which makes the offender “nobody” in the eyes of others, serves as a culture of leadership. Mention this in your rhetorical analysis essay. Cultures of aggression, aggression, and exploitation exist in all societies and at all times, but they are especially strong in the modern world. This is the problem of the interaction between the offender and the victim. The cult of spontaneity is established by the society to combat it. In the modern cult of spontaneity, the offender is a “lord”, an unbalanced person with the best interests of the family. Wife and parents, as well as the image of a “perfect spouse”, do not allow to dream of love, and the idealization of love is a hard thing to achieve. Despite the cult of spontaneity, the modern family still does not accept a completely normal love, and marriage is often regarded as vulnerability and vulnerability of spouses to each other.
Adolescence has always been considered as the privileged age of friendship. Early adolescence involves increased autonomy, emancipation from parents and a reorientation towards peers. This is a period of rapid growth of self-awareness and the consequent need for intimacy. All feelings and attitudes of this age have extremely bright emotional coloring.
Growing up, the child tears the umbilical cord of former relationships based on dependence on parents, reevaluates and rebuilds them, includes these ties into a new, more complex system in which he claims to have an independent and central role. His new orientation toward peers sharply increases during the transitional years. Younger children still distinguish two worlds (child’s and adult) and the unequal relationship between them as something natural.
The teenager no longer wants to consider himself as a child. He is increasingly oriented towards adult norms and criteria. At the same time, in order to secure autonomy, he emphasizes own age-group differences in every possible way considering himself a representative of a special, not child’s or adult, third world.
The need for a peer society is typical for teenagers. In addition to organized groups (for example, school class), informal communities that are formed outside the official world acquire great importance, especially for boys.
You can mention the following paradox in the course of essay writing on friendship: although, psychologically, the feeling of group affiliation is very important for a teenager, the rigid conformity of outside groups often comes into conflict with the need to be recognized as a unique individual. The personal “I” does not coincide with the collective “We” and is often determined precisely by this contrast.