How to write about love in a friendship?
Despite the modern rapid pace of life, during the childhood, the language of interpersonal communication remains quite simple, despite the complex social mask of the individual. Even before the very word “friend” appeared. We can call it instead “friend-like”, “having a friendly relationship”, “struggling” in imagination. All this is the language of interpersonal communication.
There are many theories of its translation, and all of them can be suspicious to an outsider. Let’s consider a few of them. The first is entirely in the system of interpersonal relations. The second theory proposes the division of people into “friend and” acquaintances. We can call it “the offer to accept a friend without fear.” It is claimed that such a decision is based on an incorrect assessment of the person himself, his interaction with other people and the material basis of friendship. It is asserted that the main value of friends is that they are both people. Even the most negative view on friendship falls into this category.
The third theory suggests that socialization influences the formation of friendship. It is related to the eighteenth century philosopher Louis IX. He put forward a definition of friendship. The following example is representative of this time: “This concept is a positive example, the essence of which is expressed in a clear and accessible form, by which the communication of persons, ideas, and ideas was carried out. That is, the friend is a participant in a single life, and the essence of his communication is the truth and the world’s view only about the outer world. Love is the ability to share the experience of another person, to which only the closest of people is applicable. Like love, friendship is not only a way to brief but also a deeply meaningful consciousness, the ability to share the inner world of another person.
The fourth theory suggests the analysis of the value of friendship. It should be understood as protecting from the loneliness of a person. Considering the social context, it is suggested to look at it from the viewpoint of the social ideal, the universality of the subject, the rationality and direction of the movement of friendship, which should be described in the essay on international friendship.
Even these theories are not identical. There is a distinction between them.
Whatever is the theory of friendship, it is worth noting that, in any case, it is worth being only friends. We must all make friends and transmit information via our phones. There is always someone to rely on in our team.
Conceptual analysis of friendship
Analyzing friends, psychologists should note that classifics, feelings, attitude towards each other, their attitude and attitude towards each other, their ideas and attitudes, as well as our attitude towards the idea of friendship, but this is not always reflected in the psychological content of communication. The sign of friendship in the form of offering the help of advice, assistance, and other tangible factors, is far from being the sign of the shallow individual.
Psychologists believe that those who focus exclusively on younger people, in most cases, are forced to make such choice. This may happen due to the development gap when, in terms of interests and behavior, the teenager is objectively closer to the younger persons than to their peers. There also may be some psychological difficulties: shyness, fear of competition especially characteristic of boys’ companies, inconsistencies in the level of claims and opportunities, etc. In this case, the emotional attachment has the compensatory nature.
In youth, psychological unity with friends and measure of self-disclosure are maximal, far superior to all other relationships. The teenager waits for estimations which are not only close to own self-esteem but also exceed it. In fact, everything happens this way, which serves as an indirect confirmation of the idea that one of the main unconscious functions of youthful friendship is the maintenance of self-esteem. Such relationships are also unique in the age range: the first independently chosen deep individual attachment is formed.
Friendly intimacy also implies some similarities between friends. But they are observed not in all aspects. Having examined a large number of friendly pairs of American schoolchildren of 13-18 years old, the researchers found similarities in objective characteristics (social origin, gender, age, etc.) and certain common behavioral traits, especially if they deviate from the generally accepted norm. The similarity turned out to be less significant in the psychological properties of friends and their social attitudes.
However, the contradictions of this age are clearly manifested. The youthful need for intimacy is strong precisely because it is fundamentally unsaturated. Youth is considered the privileged age of friendship, but the teenagers themselves often consider real feelings as a rare phenomenon.
The known uncertainty and instability of ideas about own ego give rise to the desire to test own nature by playing some uncharacteristic roles. A teenager suffers from the fact that he does not have enough means and opportunities to express own inner world. But the trouble is not so much in the lack of means as in the vagueness, incompleteness of ego.