Close

01/16/2020

They may even be downright destructive. The last thing the reader wants to see is the author’s name on the last page. A well-written thesis is worth having, regardless of its status—in university or not—and it is a shame that so many students have no idea how to write one.

They may even be downright destructive. The last thing the reader wants to see is the author’s name on the last page. A well-written thesis is worth having, regardless of its status—in university or not—and it is a shame that so many students have no idea how to write one.
I know a college student who was just accepted to Johns Hopkins who just sent in a really bad thesis, it’s a pretty bad piece, I think it was a really badly written thesis of 30 pages or something, that went up on the website, and he was a pretty good candidate for Johns Hopkins, he is probably going to do really well, a lot of people were coming after him with offers and stuff.
Thesis Writing for Students
Here are some ideas for working with theses. If you have any suggestions for writing a thesis and would like to contribute, please email me and we can discuss.
There are a couple of things that students do well, and I often use them in my own work. So, one thing people do well is make a good argument. The good argument is a basic building block of science and philosophy. Most students can make a good argument about something like “The universe came from nothing. Nothing is really nothing”, and we are not talking about a “How did the universe come from nothing?” or something like that here.
The good argument that I like is a good argument that has a really powerful conclusion based on really solid evidence. I am a big fan of an argument called the “possibility axiom.” This is what I like. We all like theories that make sense, and we use the probability axioms, or what we call the “possible worlds” theorem, when we try to derive the world, or make good predictions. If we can’t make a good prediction, we will say “If I can’t make a good prediction, I just won’t believe it, and I am free to follow your theory or not follow it,” or maybe “I am going to reject your theory because you don’t explain why you can’t make a prediction.” Or perhaps “I can’t make a good prediction, so I have nothing to test it with.”
So the “possibility axiom” is if I can’t make a good prediction, and I can’t test this theory with anything else, so that is the only thing that tells us anything about our theory of the universe.
So if this possibility axiom is a good starting point for a thesis, then there is nothing wrong with a thesis that is based on this sort of reasoning. My advice here is not to use the possibility axiom in a paper that has any argument. I usually avoid using it. But again, we don’t want to use the possibility axiom to build our thesis out of.
One problem with the possibility axiom, and the rest of the possibility axioms, is that they do not allow you to make good predictions. We are all scientists, right? To make accurate predictions we want to have an explanation, and the only way that you can be consistent about making good predictions if you are using probability axioms as a basis for constructing your theory, is if you actually accept probability models for everything, not just physics, in which case you are committing yourself to a universe that is likely to have been governed in some way by some particular kind of cos