What does interlocutors meaning?

What does interlocutors meaning?

Definition of interlocutor 1 : one who takes part in dialogue or conversation.

What is the synonym of interlocutor?

In this page you can discover 12 synonyms, antonyms, idiomatic expressions, and related words for interlocutor, like: dialogist, conversationalist, conversational-partner, speaker, interviewer, questioner, talker, middleman, appellate court, petitioner and examiner.

How do you use jejune in a sentence?

Examples of ‘jejune’ in a sentence jejune

  1. Too often their prose is jejune and lazy.
  2. But his chroniclings of social change can be embarrassingly jejune.
  3. I think that was a rather jejune period in moral philosophy.
  4. His essays are so jejune.
  5. On one level, this declaration might seem jejune, petulant.

What is a proof before answer Scots law?

A “proof before answer” is a hearing on both factual and legal issues. A proof before answer is appropriate where the court needs to hear the evidence before addressing the legal issue.

What does pro loco et tempore mean?

To desert a case pro loco et tempore means stopping the particular indictment or summary complaint proceeding further without the facts being determined. It does not prevent the prosecution re raising the case.

What is Diology?

dilogy (countable and uncountable, plural dilogies) Ambiguous or equivocal speech or discourse. Repetition of a word or phrase. (countable, nonstandard) A series of two related works. quotations ▼

What is a jejune person?

If you describe something or someone as jejune, you are criticizing them for being very simple and unsophisticated. [formal, disapproval] jejune generalizations. Synonyms: simple, silly, juvenile, naive More Synonyms of jejune.

What is the meaning of interlocutor?

in·ter·loc·u·tor  (ĭn′tər-lŏk′yə-tər) n. 1. Someone who takes part in a conversation, often formally or officially. 2. The performer in a minstrel show who is placed midway between the end men and engages in banter with them.

Why is it important to know the interlocutors’ethnicity?

Knowing the interlocutors’ ethnicity enables one to gauge their language preferences and proficiency. In other words, whatever is happening to the speaker’s articulatory representations is also happening to his interlocutor’s. In (unresolved) arguments, interlocutors have representations that cannot be identical.

Is the interlocutor the novelist or the reader?

Or Andrew could be the novelist, the interlocutor the reader (and uncertain reviewer). They might also be unwilling to work with the interlocutor picked by the government to lead the talks. Now, unless the interlocutor adopts the same method and declares what he would do, conversation is apt to become one-sided.

Do the interlocutors understand each other’s language?

If the interlocutors understand each other, we can hardly fault their language. Knowing the interlocutors’ ethnicity enables one to gauge their language preferences and proficiency. In other words, whatever is happening to the speaker’s articulatory representations is also happening to his interlocutor’s.