Close

09/13/2020

What is a definition for the concept “family” existing in the literature:

What is a definition for the concept “family” existing in the literature:

  • Intimate, marital, family relationships include all those forms of human relationships, in which the identity of the partner is unambiguity and uniqueness, that is, the same causes provoke the same consequences under the same conditions.
  • Ideal, marriage, parental and child (not related to each other) are not considered as the standard definitions. The ambiguity of the concepts “family” and “family” existing in the literature can be resolved only on the basis of concrete examples.
  • Although the notion of family is not identical with marriage, at the same time, it is not identical with the notion of any other relationship. The analogy is the difference between the traditional attitude towards children and marriage. Here is the example: you may define both types of relationships as family relationships. Then describe the basic definition of the notion “family” as children and marriage.
  • Abnormal, social (familial) characteristics of a marriage partner may be described here.
  • While describing characteristics of a marriage partner, you may not notice that they have any significant common characteristics. In the case of a single person, they may have several children. Custants, as a rule, are the ones, who provide the basic needs for the functioning of the family.
  • It should be noted in a short speech about family that the values of the spouses are subordinated to the interests of the individual (isection, selfishness, the desire for personal enrichment, etc.).
  • The value of personal space is higher than the value of the collective, marital and parental characteristics. The need for extended family is manifested, which, however, do not determine the privileges of the individual.
  • In the context of a marital crisis, the value of the marital qualities (kindness, diligence, courage, ability to live with others, etc.) is higher than the values of the individual (cunning, wicked, timid, etc.).
  • The value of material goods, including freedom of movement, property, freedom of thought, conscience, religion, etc. is higher than the values and social norms of each individual. In other words, the combination of the values and individual traits is greater than the values and normal personal qualities.
  • Social mobility. The analogy of the relationship between marriage partners and children is more complete, showing how the balance of the personality is carried out. But the characteristics of families are somewhat different in social mobility and invitation for social advancement. In the essay on social mobility and friendship, it is important to note that the values of couples are not identical in any social ways. The creation of a family is not an egalitarian process. So, the promotion of marriage is actually an uneven process.
  • The lack of sexual control. In the modern form, the institution of marriage is especially strong among heterosexuals. In other words, the intimate relationship between a man and a woman is strengthened by mutuality and support.
  • The high extramarital nature of marital ties. The large number of women and men who have relations with one another (not necessarily husband and wife) leaves no place for sexuality studies. In the essay on family relationships, it is important to note that 80% of respondents believe that sexual harmony is more important than the perception of it by the partners.
  • Neither the husband nor the wife has a predominant role in the decision of the psychological content of the family. However, in the case of love, the subject necessarily remains in the center of family values.
  • The traditional aversion to commitment and the lack of desire to share the burden of responsibility, especially for the child, which, however, were not condemned at all.
  • The high level of intra-group communication. The intra-group interaction is characterized by the existence of a large number of potential partners: relatives, friends, and so on.
  • The high level of kinship, competition for major roles, strangeness in marital ties, open source family relationships are less significant in the psychological basis of family values than the desire for personal space, the desire for own authority, privilege, and exclusivity in the family, the desire for intimate contact.
  • The desire for paternal leadership, initiative, assertiveness of the husband.
  • READ:  How to write an essay on child abuse