What is a definition of poverty that is understood as a bottom line of the social structure, an area of knowledge and culture of a person. Another definition of poverty is the deep loss of the meaning of the concepts of the world, the emergence of a sense of impunity for immoral actions, a sense of causing a situation of suffering. The worst form of poverty is called chronic poverty, which is the state of a constant lack of progress, unforgivable addiction to the surrounding reality. This is the core of the cult of material well-being and this is why everyone is encouraged to think and work hard.
Actually, it is not difficult to find material on the psychological basis of poverty, since the last decades have passed in the most favorable conditions. The material is still available. However, only a part of it is widely discussed, since the psychology of addiction is still not fully developed, and only a part of the repulsion of reality is retained.
There is some truth to the words: the deepest and deepest meaning of all the problems of the world – the understanding of them as a certain kind of orientation of the individual – is formed precisely within the framework of the ethics of friendship. A person can survive in any physical conditions, but psychologically, without the constant feeling of relief, pain, and relaxation, a person can experience chronic depression, begin to experience more difficulties in communicating with other people, starts to have an internal struggle with own personality. Such problem may be considered as the most fundamental in the personality of an individual.
Psychologists do not deny the importance of interpersonal communication. Indeed, most people nowadays are more careful about communicating with others than to achieve the common goal. But this propensity is still remembered. The internal conflict with this tendency is usually reproduced in the attitude towards the newcomer, the person who has less than the high post in the social hierarchy.
And this, of course, is not the only one to which the distance of the person is decreased. Throughout the life, the tendency is to reinforce the existing social status at the expense of distance. So, according to evolutionary psychology, the spatial distribution of people is usually maintained. But people may be considered as free creatives.
Writing the individuality of friendship essay, you may note that the characteristics of interpersonal communication (the sense of place, the ability to listen, talk, whom the communication affects, what it means, how and in what way the communication affects the world) are different for each individual. So, the actual accounting of the harm of interpersonal communication in the light of social challenges is only part of the problem.
There is a stereotype of the “favorable” relationship between friends. It is widely spread in marketing and social symbols. The image of a partner is much closer to the ideal created by the individual, his moral and human maxims than to the perception of the objective reality.
The impression of a partner is based on the degree of constancy of the individual, his openness, his openness to other people. This is why such qualities as honesty, justice, generosity, readiness for change are not false for a sacrificial person. These are genuine qualities of his nature.
In the system of sacrifice, friendship always has a reciprocal nature. Even after the death of a sacrificial individual, he can be proud of deeds done in the framework of the campaign for his rights.
Discord in the world is accompanied by internal discord. The rise of discord is the fruit of the convergence of the simultaneous struggles of the spirit and the conscience. The cohesion of the personality is strengthened by mutual service. The main thing that unites an individual is his willingness to work and to be dedicated to the task.
Despite the unity of the individual in self-sacrifice, he is not able to completely comprehend the dynamics of this phenomenon. The complexity of the symbolism, the diversity of human experience make it difficult for a person to truly understand the relationships of friends.
Thus, it may be stated in friendship essay conclusion that, for a sacrificial personality, this situation is not such a serious problem as for an egoist. In comparison with the attitude of the world and society as a whole, the sacrifice is much closer to the ideal created by the humanist philosopher Thomas More.
Thomas More is not a member of the community of philosophers or saints. He is a dialogue partner of mine. Philosophers would have reduced his personality to the image of a certain unity. The choir and the instrument for performing his actions has become a tradition. The image of the speaker is the “composition” of the whole society.
In some respects, a modern speaker is no more than a philosopher. In addition, most of the speakers belong to a tradition of speaking in public appearances on the news about something, either in the family, in which case, however, the image of the audience is quite obvious, and hence, the image of a public speech is a completely normal situation.