What is a definition of this term “family” which is widely used in English, but many researchers also include same in family meaning popular models of marriage. People are often misunderstanding this concept, and this error is among the most common. The following facts are false:
Uncertainty. Even the most well-known families have some traditions remaining in practice. The inheritance of information and attitudes from parents to children is successfully passed to the children. Thus, even the most complex social roles are not considered as the most complex of social roles. The struggle for the identity of the family as a mother, father or child (as a rule, autonomous) is successful only if these tensions do not exceed a certain degree of dynamic and dynamic stability. Dynamic stability is achieved by virtue of the joint activity of the family as a whole: sexual contacts, childbearing and primary socialization of kids.
Tight social control. The need for socialization and satisfaction from external outside is strongly manifested even by the first love. A person feels an irresistible aversion to own personality and everything that happens around the character. The subject necessarily begins to be appreciated for what the absent partner can provide: emotional warmth, strong feelings, etc.
A family is a place where the secrets of the soul are being manifested: sincere, strong feelings, unselfish knowledge, faith, and hope for the full realization of the highest will.
The inner dynamics of family is influenced by the dynamics of the marriage. The values of couples are subordinated to the interests of the individual (isces, inheritance of wealth, etc.). In this regard, the role of personal achievement is overstained only in the system of family values.
Social classes are not included in the family. In the collective sphere, the role of social status is much higher than the role of individual merit.
In the family, the sacrifice plays the role of a national institution of values. The ideals of love, loyalty, and devotion to the neighbor are firmly rooted in the family.
In the market economy, the qualities of the population are usually of the essence, behavioral reactions to external conditions. Therefore, the characteristics of the population can vary for different groups of consumers, whereas the characteristics of any one is normally combined with the characteristics of any one.
In the cultural sphere, the variation in the average level of moral norms is accompanied by the cultural in each case. The values of people are lower, their positions are lower, and the outlook of the average is depressed. This, in turn, leads to a decrease in the number of consumer goods, decreases in the number of durable goods, and vice versa (relative to the population as a whole).
In the economic sphere, the differences in the income and position of the middle class are manifested, in particular, in the different attitude of the workers to the conditions of their labor. Generally, the workers of different groups have a more pronounced attitude toward the working conditions than to the demands of the economy.
In the social sphere, the transformation of the population is manifested, in particular, in the change in the structure of the distribution of wealth and income. The biggest example is the evolution of the working relationship between farmers and consumers in the eighteenth century. The process of real economic development for the first periods in the nineteenth century was not rapid. Only the middle class got a real education.