What is different about the system of private education. It is aimed not at the workforce (institute) but at achieving the highest level of knowledge, skill and, most importantly, moral values. The system of private education is modeled on the “Thales of Atlantis”. It consists of a centralized educational system with a wide staff that ensures access to and employment for a wide range of skills and disciplines.
Competition is inherent, inherent to every employer. The only thing that prevents people from getting the desired position is lack of work experience. Therefore, it is next to impossible to achieve the highest professional status without a comprehensive knowledge base. In the process of training, the mind changes and the barrier between the career is crossed.
Of course, many people who have devoted themselves to science go to this goal for years. A young Ph.D. is a rarity.
But how to understand this concept? Before you’ll start thinking about writing the text, it is important to show the matter of the motivating factor which clearly states your attitude to the profession of education. The word “honesty” combines such categories as veneration, respect for the law, honesty with respect for any institution. It means the openness between people, their willingness to recognize their own weaknesses, limitations, albeit justified, in the framework of the generally accepted rules.
As for the definition “honesty”, it should be understood as the very opposite of “justice”. It means the absence of any preferential or partial advantage in the process of achieving the desired equality. Simply put, its essence is the equality of opportunities in the conditions of equality of opportunities.
The word “equality” is connected with the Sanskrit concept of “thē” which means the same as “justice”. In the interface of the word “equality” with “freedom”, it is translated as “freedom of”, “justice”, “taxation”, “freedom”, “fortune”, “migration”. It is not surprising. Since all communities and peoples were represented by some degree of freedom, happiness and success, it was expected that all levels of economic development would follow the same path.
So, you may state in “Does everyone have equal opportunities in education and employment?” essay that, in comparison with the ideal world, the contemporary reality shows that, even in the most developed countries, the level of income inequality is significantly lower, more and more unequal than it was in the past. In developing countries, the gap in income and living standards is also quite significant.
There are several indicators of the social process of inequality:
The actual material level of the middle class in the United States is much lower than in England (see the “Women income inequality in the United States” essay). However, the reaction of the population to the changes in the standard of living is quite positive.