What is it better to treat people responsibly, create a system of regulation, correction or just rapid economic growth than to preserve the status quo, adding to the distance between the middle class and others? In the essay on inequality between rich and poor, it is necessary to differentiate these two possibilities.
Also, the following options are proposed in a money inequality essay: social mobility and social stability – the idea of achieving equality of opportunities in the income inequality ratio for the middle class.
The following wording should be found in a legislation:
“The middle class is established as a independent social subject of legislation. Its activities are regulated by law, education, social protection, and support to the state – the implementation of the social transformation program “in the framework of the program for the social transformation of the country”.
The natural equality of opportunities is the end result of a long process of social adaptation and improvement in the material situation, the formation of a universal and relatively stable model for the society.
The main purpose of the operation of the middle class in society is the maintenance of a democratic system in the basic social categories, the formulation of rules that will allow each to settle in society, the organization of material production and the provision of services.
The principle of social responsibility is based on the principle of collective responsibility, the adherence to the norms of social responsibility for the results of the collective.
The correlation between income and productivity is the one to which the basic social factors related to income inequality are added. In other words, the following factors are of the great importance: time spent on the ladder of the middle class (if the system of representative rules is applied), social status (if the system is static), and so on.
In the system of economic inequality, the middle class is quite active in all spheres of public life. It is interested in the problems of public procedure and has tasks of social activity.
The middle class is inclined to impose the standard social order on others. Since the traditional attribution of the middle class to the progressive, democratic society is usually associated with the activity of the masses in political and economic life, the middle class strives to maintain social status at the expense of the whole society.
The main social movements occur both within the middle class and with participation of other elements of the social structure. Free channels of upward vertical mobility, clear prospects for social growth based on education and high qualifications should ensure a sufficient level of welfare for the middle class.
It should be borne in mind that, in addition to the middle class, there are further, not only lower class but also other layers of the middle class, which, in turn, is a part of the social structure of society.
In the framework of economic inequality, the middle class is a heterogeneous group. Thus, the two main economic groups, the rich and the poor, are not identical.
There are other, secondary groups besides the middle class. They may be found in the analysis of economic inequality: the middle class is associated with a lower class of the free white population; the lower class is the social group that has the dominance of economic interests over the other elements of the social structure; the middle class is a heterogeneous group. Therefore, it is not an exaggeration to say that the middle class is a “class” in the structure of economic inequality.
The relationship between the middle class and other social groups, its autonomy, social status, financial and economic characteristics, political aspirations, needs, values, etc.