What is not the best way to end your essay on poverty
Poverty is a problem that touches each corner of our planet. It is a matter of injustice and cruelty. It is a matter of indifference, indifference, insincerity and betrayal. This is what you should write in your essay on poverty and unemployment.
Originally, poverty was a problem of the common poor. Then, the poor turned into the rich. And the gap between the rich and the poor increased. If all people are poor, then the world as a whole will be filled with rich people. This is a crucial argument for economic inequality essay.
During the development of civilization, the absolute power and influence of society, in the field of scientific development, is recognized only as a result of the level of the productive forces development. Power and influence of society are the basis of the existence, development, and reproduction of the population. In the system of economic relations, the parameters of the population are determined, and the main factors of the population’s growth or stagnation, in other words, the factors of population aging are used.
But it should be emphasized in the essay on income inequality that, in the most developed countries of the world, the middle class is given a significant share of the national income, and the middle class invests funds in real estate, liquid assets. These factors influences the basic social processes, the dynamics and balance of economic development, the level of the middle class in the social hierarchy, etc. In the cultural sphere, the role of the middle class is much more modest and unobtrusive. In Europe, the role of the entire social structure is much more modest and unobtrusive. In America, the role of the middle class is much higher. In France, it is not only the most powerful social stratum, but also a “family” – a “castes” in the distribution of wealth.
Mention in the income inequality essay that the elite of the new Middle Class (1870-1910) differed from the elite of the North American society and the lower class (merenguaries, aristocrats, businessmen) only by social status. In Europe, the roots of social inequality were the basis of the position of the middle class. These were three basic elements:
The third dominant social position was the position of the proletariat (unions, collective labour, social activity, etc.).
In the process of economic stratification, the middle class expanded its sphere of activity, the boundaries of social mobility, decreased the importance of the high mobility of the population, replaced the traditional division of social roles, replaced the dominance of a traditional family.
According to Marx, the proletariat were able to achieve its “accidental” victory over the middle class only if it had a dominant position in the social structure of society. The results of the New Deal of the 1930s, which have been elaborated in detail, show that the transformation of the labor market and the creation of the middle class took place in the course of a very rapid process of growth in the labor market.
In the process of economic transformation, the middle class began to play a leading role in the distribution of income, became the main funding source of the society. As a result, the wage of the majority of the population was higher than the salaries of the lower class. In Europe, the middle class was able to enjoy a relatively high income, almost the same as the elite of the North American economy. But this was not enough. The needs of the masses in the management of social relations must be taken into account.
A number of rights related to the problem of income inequality were established after the French Revolution (1789-1799) and the split of the old aristocracy and the middle class in the process of economic development. These rights are: equality of opportunities, responsibilities, equality of social status. They imply the subordination of the individual to the conditions of social life.
A number of rights related to the problem of income inequality were established after the French Revolution. The following conditions were set: equal opportunities in all spheres, the right to life, the right to freedom, justice, and equal treatment in social institutions, the right to promotion, inclusion in the social exchange program, the right to participate in the management of businesses, mutual assistance, the right to discounted loans, concessions on the part of the population, the right to a discount on interest charges.
In Europe, the ideals of humanism were placed above material practice, and life success was determined by many parameters. America narrowed the idea of success to one component in a concrete, tangible form, and happiness was determined by the number of banknotes.