What is the conclusion of a moral war essay: for the final part, the moral and aesthetic diverges, and the duality of the consciousness and the impulse of revenge fills the frame. The image of the hero is dominant, his behaviour impressive, his humanity and humanism. This image is so prominent that the reader involuntarily begins to reflect it each day.
Material for “Why the American Dream is alive?” essay
It should be emphasized in a “Why the American Dream is alive?” essay that the modern US idea provides the work of a giant imperialist machine – a model for the future development of the whole world. The nation has created a number of realities, and the biggest of them is America. This reality shows how all the people, from the small and destitute rural population, large urban population, enjoy the benefits of the American Dream.
Today, it is difficult to imagine how the same idea was perceived by the German public. The images of the future were created. The number of possibilities is enormous. The possibilities given by the American Dream are dwarfed by the reality of life and the existence of many false possibilities.
Modern researches show that the American Dream loses its popularity. The ideas of the unification and prosperity of US society, the guarantee of freedom of speech, religion, press and assembly, idea of a country that may become an example for the whole world are being transformed today. In many ways, they are already turned into the idea of “American exclusiveness”. There are various arguments in support of this conclusion.
At the beginning of the twentieth century, the notion of “American exclusiveness” became widely used by social scientists in an attempt to explain the reasons for the weak spread of radical ideas among the American working class. The scientific community was actively seeking an answer to the question: why the United States is the only industrialized country in which a significant socialist movement has not been observed?
This problem bothered many researchers, because, according to Marx, more developed country shows less developed ones the image of their future. Proceeding from this logic, US had to become the strongest socialist country.
At the very beginning of the last century, the German socialist, sociologist Werner Sombart published a book titled “Why Is There No Socialism in the United States?” In 1927, Jay Lovestone, Secretary General of the Communist Party of the United States (later, an ardent anti-communist and CIA agent), defined “American exclusiveness” only as gradual increase in the strength and stability of capitalism, which prevented the socialist revolution in America. In 1929, Joseph Stalin, unwilling to accept the fact that America is resistant to social revolutions, called Lovestone’s ideas nothing more than heresy.
Supporters of US exclusiveness say that America is a “special case”. It is the only one in the world which, from the first day of its existence, was based on republican ideals and not on a common historical, cultural heritage, ethnic homogeneity or consolidated ruling elite. You may mention in “Who are the true beneficiaries of the American Dream?” essay that the policy of the United States always has been characterized by a system of checks and balances that have been designed in such a way as to prevent excessive strengthening of individuals or political parties.
Consequently, the United States retains free republican democracy, and citizens live on the territory whose laws reflect civil values. Another argument in support of “American exclusivity” is social mobility. The United States is known as the “country of opportunities”, and Americans are proud of this. The government of the country allegedly contributes to the creation of a “launching pad” so that any person can easily climb the social ladder.
It should be noted in “What does the American Dream mean to you?” essay that the term was somewhat abstracted from its historical context in scientific practice and political journalism. Supporters and opponents of “American exceptionalism” began to use this term in the context of a discussion about whether the United States could stand “above the law” or be “excluded from the law”, in particular, with respect to any international obligations. The terminological confusion was created. A shift in the semantic emphasis and a deviation from the historical context took place.
Defending the American Dream essay should convey the fact that many of those who adhere to the idea of traditional “American exclusiveness” agree that the United States must fully comply with international public law and act only within its framework. But, for the reasons mentioned above, “American exclusivity” and the messianic role of the United States are seen as an excuse for expansionism.
For contemporary critics of the United States, an American world expansion and aggressive foreign policy became the main counterarguments in the discourse about the uniqueness of the US idea.