What is the main idea of this article: conservatism is the only viable way to increase population, especially in the states with which wars and economic collapse were caused by the sharpest impact of economic collapse.
We prove the following hypothesis in a simple and easy to understand form: right wing of the population, which in the main part of the public consciousness mostly belongs to the educated elite, has gradually increased their social status in the last 50 years. In the process of the accumulation of income inequality, the proletariat has strengthened its position.
The process of population aging is observed: the number of old people has grown in the last 50 years, the number of children has become a force to protect the world’s population, has steadily increased. In the process of population aging, the number of people will constantly increase. This process is followed by the movement from the middle class to the upper class.
In the 50-70s, the real wages of Americans from the lower and middle classes grew more than 1.5 times. In the 1980s, its growth stopped and even slight decrease occurred. But the rate of growth stopped at the level of 1-2% per year. And even nowadays, the growth in the workforce continues.
There is no reason to expect that the pace of accumulation of income inequality will significantly weaken in the foreseeable future. According to the experts, there is enough time for a gradual transition to the value of the majority of the population, which, however, is complicated by the fact that the relative growth in the 1960s was more than doubled during the period from 1950 to 1980.
In Europe, the average adult or teen spends about 4 hours per day on labor. In the United States, the average age of a worker is 15 years. This difference in age is observed between men and women even in the very different professions.
There are different results in the study of income inequality: in the 1960s, the real wages declined by almost 20% for men and increased by 10% for women.
The decline in the wages of women was more than a double, in the 1970s – to almost double.
In the US, the average male earns $8,000 a year more than the female equivalent. The wage of the average female is just $7,000 less than the wages of males.
It is obvious that the inequality in the United States is the most pronounced in the world, and it is closely related to the equality of the outcome. In modern America, the balance between the interests of the economy and aspirations of the population is disturbed. A very significant effect is the transformation of the concept of success into the principle of social and economic development, the idea of “American exclusiveness”. The modern possibility of this success is confirmed not only in the transformation of the hierarchy of wealth and social structure but also in the increase in the number of successful entrepreneurs.
How to end the inequality essay? Shakespeare sings here. The whole work is imbued with a great sense of drama. The entire events and conflicts in the tragedy are imbued with a great force of narrative. In the light of the moral problems of the drama, the dramatic picture of life in the Post-American era is established.
Shakespeare certainly differs from many of his contemporaries (and the authors of subsequent generations) in terms of striking literary mastery. He managed to convey his thoughts brightly, sensually, to create a saturated atmosphere and revive the deepest feelings in the hearts of readers. The effect of his work on the feelings of people is clearly expressed, and the spirit of his poem is almost completely realised.
However, it is worth noting in the negative effects of income inequality essay that, in his works, Shakespeare generally follows a formula of restraint, such as “relative poverty” or “relative abundance” in a really adequate sense. Relative poverty means the amount of money, per capita, which is determined by the average incomes of a group of people. The very word “relative” means such parameters as the average incomes of certain groups. For example, the average income of the middle class in the literary work of Shakespeare is the sum of money earned by all members of the group which included representatives of the intellectual elite.
In the Shakespeare’s works, we can always feel the soul of the tragedy and its riches. The whole is imbued with a great feeling of drama. The theme of the tragedies is always dominant, pursuing the goal of revenge. The social causes of this pathos are strongly latent, being the failure of the imagination, the lack of will, the thirst for personal satisfaction. The victim is a person who, more or less consciously, recognizes own personality and the role of the tragedy in the framework of his own behavior.
The character of the tragedy is characterized by the gradual rise of the drama’s tension following the transformation of the theme of the tragedy into the center of attention. The tension is expressed in the struggle of images, the clash of images, social characters.