Close

01/16/2020

When an example has three sub-theses (or more) and it is not really an analytical essay, this is called a ‘conversative essay’ and has been discussed at great length in the excellent blog post What a Conversative Essay is.

When an example has three sub-theses (or more) and it is not really an analytical essay, this is called a ‘conversative essay’ and has been discussed at great length in the excellent blog post What a Conversative Essay is.
The introduction is usually long and includes a summary of the argumentation or ‘ground work’ and a summary of the arguments (often with some additional supporting arguments) that are being stated. The introduction is also commonly known as the ‘preamble’ and, as an aside, should never be mistaken for the opening to a novel.
The conclusion is the point made in the argumentation and can sometimes take many arguments and arguments before it is presented. The conclusion cannot always be presented with as many arguments or, if presented with as many arguments, the conclusion should be considered a ‘weak’ summary but, if presented with a few arguments from which it is to be deduced the conclusion should be considered more ‘strong’.
Note that this means any sentence-clarification after the conclusion is a ‘weak’ conclusion, this is particularly true as to where to put the summary paragraph, in which case the reader must read the summary sentence on its own once the summary has been presented.
Example
1. This is a very boring story! 2. The reason is 2. 2. It’s because of 3, which is the story’s weakness. 4. This is why! 5. We should be 5. 6. To be the next 6.
See also
ReferencesThis past May, one of my favorite games, Civilization: Beyond Earth, finally hit Steam Early Access. It was the first time I was actually able to try a Civilization game in its entirety, and I have to admit I was a little nervous. As a fan of past Civilization titles, I was worried that I wouldn’t find anything I would actually enjoy playing. After a lot of trial and error, however, I am finally a fan of Civilization: Beyond Earth. It actually manages to satisfy some of my major goals, but it also has some issues that will probably get fixed in future patches.
I’m a huge fan of strategy games like Civilization. Sure, I like the older games too but sometimes I just want to play a real-time strategy game with turn-based multiplayer. When I heard the news about Civilization: Beyond Earth, however, I knew I wanted to try it. Beyond Earth, as it turns out, is actually better than I ever imagined.
This review includes two parts: first, we break down many of the things that make this game stand out from other civ games such as Civilization V. Second, we discuss the major issues that have been brought up by players on Steam.
What Makes Civilization: Beyond Earth Different
In Beyond Earth, player’s are able to take their civilization to new heights. Not only are there more units to build and research, but each faction also now has its own unique units. I’m a huge fan of this feature, as it opens up a lot of options and makes your battles much more dynamic. I also enjoy that most of the units have unique abilities that allow them to be used in a variety of ways. With this feature, Beyond Earth is more a game about strategy, strategy, and more strategy.
Beyond Earth’s other main mechanic is the resource called “Sites,” which