What is meant by cosmological argument?
cosmological argument in American English noun. Philosophy. an argument for the existence of God, asserting that the contingency of each entity, and of the universe composed wholly of such entities, demands the admission of an adequate external cause, which is God.
Are cosmological arguments inductive?
6 Theme 1A: Inductive arguments – cosmological The nature of induction ■■ The cosmological argument is an inductive argument. Inductive reasoning is a posteriori (post experience) because it depends upon empirical (derived from the senses) evidence and experience that leads to a possible conclusion.
Does the cosmological argument relate to the ontological argument?
Kant contended that the cosmological argument, in identifying the necessary being, relies on the ontological argument, which in turn is suspect. We will return to these criticisms below. Both theists and nontheists in the last part of the 20 th century and the first part of the 21 st century generally show a healthy skepticism about the argument.
What is the Kalam cosmological argument?
The Kalam Cosmological Argument is one of the most popular cosmological arguments around today. The argument is fairly straightforward and enjoys intuitive support. It goes like this: “Whatever begins to exist had a cause; the universe began to exist; therefore, the universe had a cause.”
Is the cosmological argument a posteriori?
As an a posteriori argument, the cosmological argument begins with a fact known by experience, namely, that something contingent exists. We might sketch out a version of the argument as follows. A contingent being (a being such that if it exists, it could have not-existed or could cease to exist) exists.
Is there a cosmological argument in Asian philosophy?
Although the cosmological argument does not figure prominently in Asian philosophy, a very abbreviated version of it, proceeding from dependence, can be found in Udayana’s Nyāyakusumāñjali I,4.