Despite the fact that in the process of working on a thesis, the curator is considered the main assistant and adviser to the student, at the end of the process this person will make a review of the thesis. The strength of this document can in no case be diminished, since it, like defensive speech, plays a huge role in the final assessment, and often, based on this document, the attestation commission assesses.
Who should write a review?
Of course, the formation of a review is the direct responsibility of the curator, but it is not uncommon for the student to shoulder this task. Someone explains this by saying that the author is better versed in his work, which means that the feedback provided by him will be able to show it in a more favorable light. Of course, if the curator refuses to write a review with his own hands, then you should not go for confrontation and insist on your own, since the manager may write a bad review and recommend a low rating or simply not accept the work. Nevertheless, even if you agreed to handwritten a review, you should remember that it is necessary to write it from the point of view of the curator, which means that the sample of the review of the head of the thesis is obligatory for familiarization.
In essence, a standard sample of the thesis supervisor’s review provides a general description of the project and the recommended grade. As a rule, the review should be brief and concise and take no more than two A4 pages. Despite the small volume, the structure of the review can be divided into three parts:
- The introductory part, which indicates the name and surname of the author, the topic of the work, as well as its relevance, key problems and tasks that the author solved during the writing of the thesis.
- The main part deals with the individual elements of the project, identifies the main advantages and disadvantages of the thesis, and in general provides a description of the work in terms of its novelty and level of writing.
- Conclusion or conclusion, which summarizes all of the above, as well as provides a reasoned justification for the assessment of the thesis in general. In fact, in this part the curator decides whether to allow the student to protect or not.
Naturally, if you are lucky with the curator, and he takes an active part in the process of working on the thesis, then he should give an indicative review and assessment orally no later than six weeks before the defense. This is necessary so that you have time to correct the mistakes made. The final review must be filed in writing for work, and the student may no longer be provided for review. As practice shows, the ideal is the situation in which the curator writes a review of the thesis with the student. In this case, it turns out to be complete and can submit work from the most advantageous side.
Despite the fact that the sample of the supervisor’s response to a thesis found on the Internet is not a problem, we strongly discourage you from using ready-made reviews. The fact is that each work, regardless of the topic or specialty, is unique in its own way, which means that the downloaded template will not be able to characterize it fully. Moreover, remember that the other members of the attestation commission will definitely study this review, which means that the risk of identifying a template is extremely high. Based on this, the only acceptable option would be to contact our company. Our authors have extensive experience in writing reviews and reviews for any type of work and projects and guarantee complete uniqueness and individual approach.