Category: Interesting

After you have written your thesis, received all the signatures and prepared everything completely, the last thing remains – protection.

On defense, you must read the report and answer questions from the commission and students.

To make your work a little easier, we offer an example of a report to defend a thesis, as well as recommendations for the presentation.

What does the report consist of?

In essence, the report on protection consists of the introduction and conclusions of your thesis. But first things first.

You build your report as follows:

• Opening speech. You should greet the commission and its chairman. Be sure to use the word “respected”. Then you introduce yourself and name the topic of your thesis.
• The content of the work. You read part of the introduction of the thesis: describe the relevance of the work, the object, subject, goals and objectives. Dwell on the problematics.
• The report should include information on the main sources used, research methods, work structure. Prepare this information, but be prepared to be asked to skip these items.
• Further you, using the conclusions of the thesis, describe the information and announce the conclusions. You must reveal the essence of the work, without going into details. Use visual materials: video, graphics, slides, drawings. This will add you points when grading.
• At the end you sum up. Describe whether the goals are achieved. The report should be finished with the words “The report is finished. Thank you for attention”.
• You will be asked questions, so prepare just in case information that you think might be of interest to the commission.

How to read a report on the protection of the thesis

It is very important not only what you say, but also how. After hearing more than a dozen reports, the commission perceives for the most part a voice, not data.

Speech should be clear, intelligible, concise. Be sure to say so.

Read from the sheet is not recommended. You can pry, but do not stand, buried in a piece of paper.

Do not make long pauses, but it’s not worth jabbering. Share your text evenly. You have about ten minutes. Do not make the report short, as this will create a feeling of insignificance of the study, but it is not necessary to delay. Optimally – 8 minutes.

Use demo materials. Speaking of what you are showing, do not stand a pillar – use a pointer, a pen or, in extreme cases, hand to point to the right place. This gives the impression of confidence and correctness of the speaker.

Be sure to practice reading the report at home. This is especially true for difficult to pronounce terms and turns.

You will be asked questions. Do not be afraid and do not get lost. Try to predict what questions may be and prepare this information. Answer needs to be short and to the point. If you do not know at all what to say, or if you are asked about something that has not been considered, do not be afraid to answer “this question does not concern the topic of my thesis.” It is better if you explain why it does not concern.

Be very polite. Give thanks for each question. After the end of the thesis defense, it is accepted to thank the supervisor for their help and participation, as well as the commission and all those present for their attention.

Finally

An example of a report to defend a thesis is easy to find. But writing it correctly is not so easy. If you are unable to write a good thesis report, contact us! Qualified specialists will prepare for you an excellent report according to all requirements!

Undergraduate and graduate students for successful certification publish articles. Although the review should be written by managers or third-party reviewers, they often do not want to spend their time on it, and then the student himself is forced to figure out how to write a review of the article.

Appointment of a review of a scientific article

If an article is scheduled for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, it must be accompanied by a review of a person who has a degree in a specialty related to the subject of the article. This is a kind of “quality mark”. In some journals, a review is required for all articles without exception, in others, only for those written by undergraduate and graduate students (if the author himself has a scientific degree, the review is not requested).

Definition 1

A review is not a fully independent work, but a kind of secondary product created on the basis of the article under review.

To write a competent review, you must:

• Carefully read the article under review.
• Find and study a sample of a review of a scientific article (it is better for the journal of the attestation commission, since they place stricter requirements on the reviews, and the quality of such a sample will be higher).
• Following the example of a review on an article of the attestation commission, make your review (containing an assessment of the article you need).

What should contain a review of a scientific article

In essence, the review is a review. The review can be written on any work – a book, a play, a film. The review of a scientific article has several distinctive features:

• The style of the review should correspond to the style of the article — be scientific, not artistic.
• A scientific article is reviewed before publication and contains an opinion on whether to publish it at all.

Although the rules for writing reviews of articles on standards are not defined, there are generally accepted basic components of the review:

• Thesis analysis of the article. A person who has not read the article should understand what it is, what position the author holds.
• Evaluation of novelty – is something new proposed in the article, or are the existing points of view systematized, or are others’ surveys repeated.
• Evaluation of the quality of the content of the article, the depth of research material.
• Evaluation of compliance with the requirements for registration – the requirements for registration are different for different journals, so the reviewer must take into account where the publication is planned.
• The present and relevance of the article (and the materials used in it).

Example 1

If an article on jurisprudence (not of a historical nature) is based on legislation that is no longer in force, it will not be of value.

• The significance of the article for science and practice.
• Final assessment – whether to publish an article or refuse to publish.

Sample article review plan

The review of the scientific work can be written according to the following plan:

• Information about the author of the article, its title.
• Thesis coverage of the article.
• Evaluation of the relevance of the chosen topic (you can rely on the justification of relevance from the article itself).
• Assess whether scientific research is meaningful. If their significance is recognized, then specifically – where can be applied in practice, what prospects for further research open up.
• Opinion on the expediency of accepting an article for publication.
• Information about the reviewer – surname, name, patronymic, academic degree and academic title, place of work and position.

According to this plan, writing a review of an article in the journal of the attestation commission can be carried out. It is important that the review should be objective, indicating both the strengths of the article and its shortcomings.

Remark 1

If the review does not mention a single negative point, it may cause suspicion either in the reviewer’s bias or in his negligence.

Typical review volume is about 4,000 characters without spaces.

Phrase templates for article reviews

The review of the article (especially the attestation commission) should be stylistically literate. To comply with the scientific style of the text, it is advisable to use such turns:

1. In this article, the author highlights the problem …
2. The problem considered by the author …
3. During the review of the work under review …
4. Work done at a high level …
5. The author demonstrated a deep study …
6. From the reviewed work follows …
7. The author of the article under review draws conclusions …
8. This article is an example …
9. The need to write an article on issues … caused by the state …
10. The author of the article applied non-standard and innovative research methods …
11. The position expressed by the author is controversial …
12. The theoretical significance of the article is that …
13. The practical significance of the article is due to the fact that …
14. The author set forth in some detail …
15. The author rightly notes that …
16. The list of sources used by the author contains …
17. The article is recommended for publication in the journal …

Despite the fact that in the process of working on a thesis, the curator is considered the main assistant and adviser to the student, at the end of the process this person will make a review of the thesis. The strength of this document can in no case be diminished, since it, like defensive speech, plays a huge role in the final assessment, and often, based on this document, the attestation commission assesses.

Who should write a review?

Of course, the formation of a review is the direct responsibility of the curator, but it is not uncommon for the student to shoulder this task. Someone explains this by saying that the author is better versed in his work, which means that the feedback provided by him will be able to show it in a more favorable light. Of course, if the curator refuses to write a review with his own hands, then you should not go for confrontation and insist on your own, since the manager may write a bad review and recommend a low rating or simply not accept the work. Nevertheless, even if you agreed to handwritten a review, you should remember that it is necessary to write it from the point of view of the curator, which means that the sample of the review of the head of the thesis is obligatory for familiarization.

Review Content

In essence, a standard sample of the thesis supervisor’s review provides a general description of the project and the recommended grade. As a rule, the review should be brief and concise and take no more than two A4 pages. Despite the small volume, the structure of the review can be divided into three parts:

1. The introductory part, which indicates the name and surname of the author, the topic of the work, as well as its relevance, key problems and tasks that the author solved during the writing of the thesis.
2. The main part deals with the individual elements of the project, identifies the main advantages and disadvantages of the thesis, and in general provides a description of the work in terms of its novelty and level of writing.
3. Conclusion or conclusion, which summarizes all of the above, as well as provides a reasoned justification for the assessment of the thesis in general. In fact, in this part the curator decides whether to allow the student to protect or not.

Naturally, if you are lucky with the curator, and he takes an active part in the process of working on the thesis, then he should give an indicative review and assessment orally no later than six weeks before the defense. This is necessary so that you have time to correct the mistakes made. The final review must be filed in writing for work, and the student may no longer be provided for review. As practice shows, the ideal is the situation in which the curator writes a review of the thesis with the student. In this case, it turns out to be complete and can submit work from the most advantageous side.

Ready review

Despite the fact that the sample of the supervisor’s response to a thesis found on the Internet is not a problem, we strongly discourage you from using ready-made reviews. The fact is that each work, regardless of the topic or specialty, is unique in its own way, which means that the downloaded template will not be able to characterize it fully. Moreover, remember that the other members of the attestation commission will definitely study this review, which means that the risk of identifying a template is extremely high. Based on this, the only acceptable option would be to contact our company. Our authors have extensive experience in writing reviews and reviews for any type of work and projects and guarantee complete uniqueness and individual approach.

The requirements of the Higher Attestation Commission for a doctoral dissertation are very stringent. But in the end, the applicant receives the academic title of Doctor of Sciences. It is important not only to conduct a study, but also to do it 100% well. In order for the work to comply with all norms and rules, you will have to try very hard. So, what should the doctoral dissertation on the requirements of the Higher Attestation Commission contain?

Work structure

There are no clear requirements for the structure of the work, but usually it looks like this:

• title page;
• content;
• introduction;
• the main text of the study;
• conclusion;
• explanation of terms;
• bibliography;
• applications.

Most importantly, follow the logical sequence of chapters.

How to write a work

In order for the work to be properly built, it is important to be able to organize your own thoughts. First you need to clearly articulate the name. After all, the name itself is the first thing that members of the Higher Attestation Commission will hear from the candidate. The name is a guideline for the candidate, and the more accurately it is formulated, the easier it will be to limit the scope of research.

Before conducting a scientific research, it is necessary to carefully study the works of other scientists, because the task of the candidate is to develop new methods for solving the problem. In a word, research must be unique.

Next, we should describe in detail the author’s research methodology, indicate what the result was as a result. The more accurately goals and objectives were identified at the beginning of the work, the more specific will be the conclusion, that is, the result of scientific work. The volume of the whole text, excluding the title page, bibliography, content and applications, should be at least 200 sheets.

The final work should be written in scientific language. At the same time, it should be understood not only by scientists, but also by a wider audience. To make the study easier to perceive, it must be supplemented with diagrams, tables, formulas, graphs.

Recommendations

It is important to state your thoughts logically and consistently. You cannot go far from the topic, the text should contain information strictly on the topic. In addition, the work should be written in your own words, you cannot copy information from other sources. If extracts from sources are found, they should be issued in the form of citations. Probably not worth mentioning that the text should not contain grammatical errors, colloquial expressions.

The main requirement of the Higher Attestation Commission is at least twenty articles published in journals and approved by the Higher Attestation Commission. Without such publications, protection will not be possible. After drawing up the review, it is necessary to correct all the shortcomings and controversial issues that the reviewer highlighted.

Doctoral dissertation is a huge work, and not every candidate as a result of his work receives a degree. It is necessary to spend a lot of time and effort on the development of new methods, carefully study all scientific materials on the topic.

Not everyone can cope with the task, and it is almost impossible to find an artist for such a difficult job. But there is a way out – the specialists of our company have successful experience in writing scientific papers in various fields. Our staff in a short time will compose a unique literate text written in a scientific and accessible language. In the end, a full-fledged doctoral dissertation will be obtained – the requirements of the Higher Attestation Commission, the structure of the text, the consistency and consistency of the text will be observed 100%, regardless of the topic and complexity of the work.